If they themselves cannot reach shredder the spot, they can at least send their relief articles or money through some reliable organisations or the government machinery engaged in the relief work.
Numerous huts of the poor people are demolished by constant water-stagnation, making them homeless. Food grains become rare in the flood-affected areas. There are many other problems that a flood brings to the unfortunate people, in whose area flood enters. Although the government and the charitable organizations send their instant relief by boat or helicopter,- food, clothes, powdered milk, medicine etc., yet that is not enough for removing their endless distress that continues for a long time after the flood. The Indian governments have since taken some major steps for protecting the people from flood. There are certain areas, especially in Bengal and Assam, where frequent thesis floods appear due to the overflow of the rivers, such as the Brahmaputra or the ganga. A special commission has been set up to take precautionary measures before the monsoons so as to prevent flood in those particular areas. At the time of flood in any area, all the civilized citizens should come forward with their helping hand.
And in that marshy land, the remains of the dead cattle or the skeletons of human corpses lay scattered, making the entire area extremely polluted. That brings about plague, cholera and other dangerous diseases to those who somehow survive. Thus the flood is a horror, and its aftereffects are more horrible. After the flood, there is hardly anything left for the people to accept. The crops do not grow, because the land becomes barren. The water of the tanks and wells gets polluted. The scarcity of drinking water becomes an acute problem. The cattle having died, the poor householders become helpless.
Essay on, flood for Children and Students
Flood appears as a curse to the people who are directly affected. There are mainly two reasons that can create a flood: excessive rains and overflow of rivers. Rain is welcome for the growth of crops and cooling down the atmosphere, especially after the hot summer. But excessive rains spoil the harvest, and sometimes with the accumulated rain water, the tanks are overflowed and fields and roads remain under water, and even water enters the courtyard or drowns the ground floors of human habitations. As the stagnant water remains for a few days, the people face numerous difficulties.
The insects, the serpents and many poisonous creatures take shelter in the human abodes, causing threat to the lives of the dwellers. The cattle, unable to save their lives, die for want of food and shelter. The water becomes polluted, causing various life-taking diseases. People are sometimes found to take shelter on the branches of trees, which are near at hand, in order to save themselves, when their houses are submerged in water. After the flood, mastering it takes a long time for the wet land to get dried.
3) with the first promise of a savior, (3) the noahic covenant (Gen. 6-9) with the promise never to destroy the earth by flood again, (4) the Abrahamic covenant (Gen. 12-35) with the promise of multitudinous "seed (5) the mosaic covenant (Exod. 19-24) with the promise of grace, (6) the davidic covenant (ii sam. 7:1-16) with the promised throne of david, and (7) the new covenant (Heb.
8:8) which fulfills the promise of Jeremiah 31:31 and God's ultimate purpose for an "elect people" in covenant relationship with Himself. Does the emphasis on "covenant" serve to cast God's dealings with man into a legal, judicial, contractual framework? Is God the ultimate "legal contractor" who keeps adding clauses to the contract? Does the whole framework of legality diminish the dynamic and ontological essence of God's function? Does the covenantal and legal framework lend itself to external behavioral legalism? A second prominent feature of covenant theology is the focus upon the "people of God." God, the father, chose a "people" for Himself; the son agreed to pay the penalty for their sin; the holy Spirit agreed to apply the benefits of the son's work. Does God need a "people" so necessarily as to become contingent on man for such?
Thesis Statement, creator: - mcGarvey online
Societal and moral law was emphasized to maintain the new social structures. These presentation sociological and cultural factors lent themselves to the development of a corresponding political theology which emphasized law and covenant prezi and sovereignty. Covenant theology has been conducive to political enmeshment throughout its history, as is evidenced by the contemporary resurgence of "theonomy" and "reconstructionism.". Theologians and authors identified with covenant theology include jonathan Edwards (1703-1758 Charles Hodge (1797-1878 Philip mauro, albertus pieters, Oswald Allis, william Cox, Anthony hoekema, herman Ridderbos and John Murray, as well as many others. Covenant theology is closely connected with "five-point" Calvinistic theology, though not to be equated with such. Some of the prominent features of covenant theology include (1) the idea of a common "covenant of grace (2) emphasize on the singular collective "people of God (3) unity and uniformity of God's people and the bible. A single, over-all, everlasting "covenant of grace" is postulated by covenant theology. The mention of an "everlasting covenant" in Genesis 17:7,13,19 serves as the basis for this single, unified covenant, within which a series of subordinate covenants are said to build upon one another so as to culminate in the "new covenant." even so, the old and. 1,2) in the garden of Eden with the promise of perfect environment, (2) the Adamic covenant (Gen.
Covenant Theology, covenant reporter theology is also referred to as "Reformed theology" and occasionally as "Federal theology." Reformed theology is not equivalent to reformation theology. In their protestation against the theology of Roman Catholicism, martin Luther and John Calvin, among others, developed distinctive theological interpretations, so that Lutheran theology and Calvinistic theology both existed prior to reformed or covenant theology. It was not until the seventeenth century that a systematized theology based upon the idea of "covenant" developed. Samuel Rutherford (1600-1661) from Scotland, and Johannes Cocceius (1603-1669) of Holland, were both instrumental in the establishment of covenant theology. It became firmly entrenched in Reformed Protestant theology after the Church of Scotland accepted the westminster Confession in 1647, which incorporated the idea of federal or covenant theology into a creedal statement for the first time. The socio-political climate in which these ideas germinated is important. In the seventeenth century, the european societies were breaking free from the old feudalistic system of governance. There was strong emphasis on national sovereignty and on social contracts or "covenants" to defend national freedom.
the two predominant theological systems in conservative christian theology today (covenant theology and Dispensational theology and then proposing another theological interpretation (Christocentric theology that avoids some of the problems presented by the other two. This will necessarily involve some critique of the predominant theological systems and their presuppositions. Questions will be asked about their premises, some of which beg for an answer. We seek not to destroy these theological systems, but to honestly inquire, question and confront. In that these theological systems have innumerable variations among their proponents with subtle nuances of differing interpretation, we must attempt to analyze the over-all system and simplify the issues involved without being so simplistic as to misrepresent. Not an easy task!
Theology is not necessarily overly intellectual or "unspiritual." Granted, there has been much theology that has been nothing more than academic exercises in "God-talk but this antenna does not negate the legitimacy of genuine theological consideration which seeks Biblical documentation and spiritual understanding. In analyzing the theological systems that predominate today, it is important that we remain as objective as possible. We do not want to misrepresent what others believe. We do not want to set up "straw men which any wind-bag could blow down. We do not want to engage in ballistic brick-throwing and unloving polemics against Christian peoples who hold differing theological opinions. Genuine and sincere bible-believing Christians subscribe to varying theological systems. Never do we want to "write someone off" and deny that they are our Christian brother or sister because they organize their "belief-system" differently that we do, provided they profess that Jesus is the Christ and have received Him by faith.
Dispensational Theology, covenant Theology, and, christocentric Theology, a comparison of theological systems noting the overemphases on continuity or discontinuity in the major theological systems. 1999 by, james. You are free to download this article provided it remains intact without alteration. You are also free to transmit this article and" this article provided that proper citation of authorship is included. Everyone engages in theology. Everyone has a theology. The word "theology" is derived from two Greek words, theos meaning "God and logos meaning "word" with extended meanings of "reasoning" or "logic." Theology refers to "reasoning about God." everyone has some "reasoning about God including the atheist who rejects the "god" he has reasoned. Christians should not be afraid of theology or have an aversion towards theology.